The Influence of Positive and Negative Reasons on Generation Z Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in Online Shopping: A Comparative Study of Search Goods and Experience Goods

Authors

  • lily Wijaya Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar
  • Nathania Trinita Shallomita Pandey Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar
  • Keisya Engguenia Kawuwung Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar
  • Charlesyn Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar
  • Mahdiyah Malak Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar
  • Angeline Virginia Gonardo Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar
  • Monalisa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58191/jomel.v6i1.488

Keywords:

Positive Reasons, Negative Reasons, Behavioural Reasoning Theory, Attitude, Purchase Intention

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of positive reasons (reasons for) and negative reasons (reasons against) on attitudes and purchase intentions among Generation Z online shoppers using the Behavioural Reasoning Theory (BRT) framework. The study also compares how these reasons operate across different product categories, namely search goods and experience goods. Data were collected through a survey of 200 Gen Z respondents who actively engage in online shopping. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Square–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that positive reasons have a positive and significant effect on attitude, with a path coefficient of 0.607, making it the strongest determinant of consumer attitude. Negative reasons also significantly influence attitude, although with a much weaker effect (β = 0.090). Furthermore, attitude significantly and strongly affects purchase intention, with a path coefficient of 0.709. The R-square results show that 43.1% of the variance in attitude is explained by positive and negative reasons, while 50.3% of the variance in purchase intention is explained by attitude. These findings support BRT’s central proposition that reasons serve as rational explanations that shape attitudes before influencing behavioral intentions. Comparative analysis between search goods and experience goods further suggests that positive reasons remain the dominant factor across both product types. Overall, this research confirms that Behavioural Reasoning Theory is an appropriate framework to understand Gen Z’s decision-making processes in online shopping and provides practical implications for e-commerce businesses to strengthen reasons for in digital marketing strategies.

References

Amthauer, J., Fleiß, J., Guggi, F., & Robertson, V. H. S. E. (2023). Detecting resale price maintenance for competition law purposes: Proof-of-concept study using web scraped data. Computer Law and Security Review, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105901

Azemi, Y., Ozuem, W., Wiid, R., & Hobson, A. (2022). Luxury fashion brand customers’ perceptions of mobile marketing: Evidence of multiple communications and marketing channels. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102944

Brand, B. M. (2025). Bridging the intention-behavior-gap through digitalized information (?) - Two laboratory experiments in the textile industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104179

Cebollada, J Chu, Y., & Jiang, Z. (2019). Online Category Pricing at a Multichannel Grocery Retailer. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 46. https://doi.org/10..,1016/j.intmar.2018.12.004

Chan, T. Y., Narasimhan, C., & Yoon, Y. (2017). Advertising and price competition in a manufacturer-retailer channel. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.04.001

Kaur Chatrath, S., Batra, G. S., & Chaba, Y. (2022). Handling consumer vulnerability in e-commerce product images using machine learning. Heliyon, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10743

Guan, Z., Yu, T., Dong, J., & Zhang, J. (2024). Impact of consumers’ anticipated regret on brand owners’ blockchain adoption in the presence of a secondhand market. International Journal of Production Economics, 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109197

Hutchins, D. A., & Hurley, R. A. (2024). Graduate Student Literature Review: A systematic review of articles influencing United States retail cheese packaging, labeling, and market trends related to cheese in the marketplace and during consumption. In Journal of Dairy Science (Vol. 107, Issue 12, pp. 10244–10255). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23977

Jiang, G., Tadikamalla, P. R., Shang, J., & Zhao, L. (2016). Impacts of knowledge on online brand success: An agent-based model for online market share enhancement. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.051

Khalek, S. A., Dey, D., Chakraborty, A., & Samanta, T. (2025). From expectations to frustrations: Dissecting negative experiences to understand negative word-of-mouth in online grocery services. Diakses pada 7 Juni 2025.

Lim, S. G. (Edward), & Ok, C. “Michael.” (2022). A percentage-off discount versus free surcharge: The impact of promotion type on hotel consumers’ responses. Tourism Management, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104504

Lockshin, L., & Corsi, A. M. (2012). Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions. In Wine Economics and Policy (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2012.11.003

Mookherjee, S., Lee, J. J., & Sung, B. (2021). Multichannel presence, boon or curse?: A comparison in price, loyalty, regret, and disappointment. Journal of Business Research, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.041

Petcharat, T., Jattamart, A., & Leelasantitham, A. (2023). A conceptual model to imply a negative innovation assessment framework on consumer behaviors through the electronic business platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103450

Qiu, K., & Zhang, L. (2024). How online reviews affect purchase intention: A meta-analysis across contextual and cultural factors. Data and Information Management, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2023.100058

Rashid, N., Imtiaz, A., Ali, J., & Sorooshian, S. (2025). Mitigating The Impact of Purchase Uncertainty on Reverse Supply Chain Through Impulsive Consumer Buying with Moderation of Lenient Return Policies. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100207

Rausch, T. M., Baier, D., & Wening, S. (2021). Does sustainability really matter to consumers? Assessing the importance of online shop and apparel product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102681

Ratchford, B., Soysal, G., Zentner, A., & Gauri, D. K. (2022). Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research. Journal of Retailing, 98(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.02.007

Sarkar, B., Dey, B. K., Ma, J.-H., Sarkar, M., Guchhait, R., & Ahn, Y.-H. (2024). Does outsourcing enhance consumer services and profitability of a dual-channel retailing? Diakses pada 11 Oktober 2025.

Schacker, M., & Slabeva, K. S. (2023). A morphology of digital direct-To-consumer (D2C) models. Procedia Computer Science, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.278

Sharma, N., Acquila-Natale, E., Dutta, N., & Hernández-García, Á. (2025). A tale of stores and screens: Unveiling consumer behaviour in omnichannel retailing through the lens of behavioural reasoning. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101480

Thomas, R. W., Ueltschy Murfield, M. L., & Ellram, L. M. (2022). Leveraging sustainable supply chain information to alter last-mile delivery consumption: A social exchange perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.014

Tsai, P. H., & Tang, J. W. (2023). Consumers’ switching intention towards E-commerce platforms’ store-to-store pickup services: The application of the extended PPM model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103535

Wang, L., & Bae, S. M. (2020). How to avoid the free shipping pitfall? Changing consumer attitudes from the perspective of information interaction. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100996

Wang, Z., Liu, H., Fan, X., & Zhang, T. (2024). Integrating machine learning and robust optimization for new product development: A consumer and expert preference-based approach. Diakses pada 10 April 2025.

Wu, Z., & Luo, J. (2022). Online information privacy and price: A theoretical model and empirical tests. Information and Management, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103583

Zhang, L., Wang, X., Majeed, S., & Zhou, Z. (2025). How do sales promotions, communication agents, and psychological contracts determine purchase hesitation? Diakses pada 19 Juli 2025.

Zhang, M., He, S., Wang, P. P., Zhao, Z., Wang, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2025). Channel structures and ESG initiatives for logistics service providers. Diakses pada 15 Maret 2025.

Zhang, Y., Voorhees, C. M., Lin, C., Chiang, J., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2022). Information Search and Product Returns Across Mobile and Traditional Online Channels. Journal of Retailing, 98(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.05.001

Abu Farha, A. K., El Hedhli, K., Alnawas, I., Zourrig, H., & Becheur, I. (2024). Drivers and outcomes of a shopper-retailer’s app relationship. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104002

Published

2026-02-22

How to Cite

Wijaya, lily, Pandey, N. T. S. ., Kawuwung, K. E., Charlesyn, Malak , M. ., Gonardo , A. V. ., & Monalisa. (2026). The Influence of Positive and Negative Reasons on Generation Z Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in Online Shopping: A Comparative Study of Search Goods and Experience Goods. Jurnal Online Manajemen ELPEI, 6(1), 1781–1793. https://doi.org/10.58191/jomel.v6i1.488

Issue

Section

Articles